As a member of the Independence City Council, and the
Chairman of its Audit and Finance Committee, I am responding to a recent column
in Examiner. In his September 7, 2012 Examiner On My Mind article, Mr. Everett has accurately recited information
that has been available to the public since May 14, 2012 when the Council was
presented the Proposed Operating Budget for the fiscal year July 1, 2012
through June 30, 2013. In fact, much of this information was available and
publically discussed prior to the budget document Mr. Everett referenced.
After listing 14 projects shown in the Line Item Budget
Supplement, and their corresponding amounts budgeted for debt principal and
interest, Mr. Everett exclaims that, “These figures show that our City, in
servicing its indebtedness, pays out more than double in interest and fees than
on principal!” Though he uses the words,
“It appears that we should have serious concerns,” he goes on to conclude that
this information means the City has not been a good steward over its
finances. His conclusion is based upon
facts and figures taken out of context and that is what I, as an elected
official, take issue with and will address and clarify here.
·
Adventure Oasis Water Park;
·
Athletic Sports Complex;
·
Purchase of emergency equipment for the Police
and Fire departments;
·
Improvements to our electric and water
transmission and distribution systems; and,
·
Acquisition of an electric generation facility
to provide reliable power to the homes and businesses in Independence.
These
projects have provided basic services, improved public safety, and enhanced our
quality of life. In many cases, projects
that are debt financed are associated with funding that the City committed to
use for such purposes and within certain timeframes. Keeping our commitment to
the citizens is part of the equation of determining when and when not to issue
debt. Another factor considered is
meeting the needs of our departments and the regulatory mandates placed upon
our city by the State and Federal levels of government. Each issue is carefully
evaluated to determine the best and most cost effective way to proceed. These reviews include input from City
personnel as well as external financial experts, including the national bond
rating agency of Standard’s and Poor. This is an outside, independent review of
the debt issuance. This expert input and
evaluation is available to the Council for review as decisions are made.
The City also closely watches for when debt can be issued to
achieve the lowest interest rates. We did this with the recent issuance of debt
to make required improvements to the sanitary sewer system to meet regulatory
mandates from the EPA. We also look for opportunities to refinance our current
debt and lower the interest cost on this debt, just as many homeowners have
been doing for a number of years.
In conclusion, while Mr. Everett presents correct financial
figures, he has failed to present a complete picture of the context in which
these figures are significant to our citizens.
His conclusions are incorrect and short-sighted. Without the wise use of debt issuance, many
wonderful projects that directly benefit our citizens could not be undertaken. While I would love to have City revenue
accounts flush enough to fund capital improvements “cash on the barrel,” as my
grandparents used to say, this is simply not possible nor desirable today. This is why we use the common financial
practice of issuing debt. As stewards of
our City, we take great care in how and when we do issue it.